Schick-Wilkinson Sues Gillette, Alleging False Advertising
Oct 3, 2003
| Print this page
The makers of Schick-Wilkinson Sword shaving products have sued rival Gillette Co., accusing the razor industry leader of falsely claiming a technological edge in the latest clash in what has been described as the "Battle of the Blades."
The three-count lawsuit, filed in federal court in Hartford, CT, U.S., takes issue with Boston-based Gillette billing its latest offerings as "The Best a Man Can Get" and other slogans Schick calls intentionally misleading.
"Gillette's actions are offensive to the public," according to the lawsuit, filed by St. Louis, MO, U.S. based Eveready Battery Co. Inc. and two of its subsidiaries, Energizer Battery Inc. and Schick Manufacturing Inc. Schick is based in Milford, CT. U.S.
The lawsuit, singling out Gillette's marketing of its three-bladed Mach3 Turbo and its three-bladed Sensor 3 disposable razor, asks a judge to order Gillette to halt the questioned advertising, detail any related profits and to pay Schick unspecified damages.
"Gillette's false advertisements are causing substantial injury to Schick," the lawsuit alleges.
Gillette spokesman Eric Kraus said that "we stand behind our claims, and we look forward to upholding them in court." He declined to discuss the matter further.
But the intensity of the competition was evident in August when Gillette sued Schick for patent infringement hours after Schick announced the Quattro.
In that case filed in federal court in Boston, MA, U.S. Gillette said the new Quattro infringes on patented "progressive geometry" technology it developed to allow the three blades on its Mach3 system to extend progressively closer to the beard.
Gillette has claimed it spent U.S. $1 billion developing its Mach3 Turbo.
Schick said in its lawsuit that Gillette advertisements have billed the Mach3 Turbo -- a direct rival to Schick's four-bladed men's Quattro razor launched last month -- as "the world's best shave" and the "best a man can get." Another ad allegedly touts the Mach3 as "the closest, the most comfortable. It's a fact. We guarantee it."
Gillette launched its Sensor 3 in May as a rival to Schick's Xtreme 3, touting it in advertising as superior to all other disposable razors.
"The superiority claims made by Gillette in both of these campaigns are false," the lawsuit alleges, insisting that even-handed marketing is crucial.
"Advertising of product qualities in this market segment has been and continues to be a critically important means to persuade customers to buy one's brand," the lawsuit argues. "Therefore, it is vital that such advertising be honest and fair in the messages it conveys to consumers about one's own product and about the products of one's competitors." (Reuters)
Back to Breaking News