Global Supplier Directory
Supplier Solutions
Whitepaper Library
Calendar of Events
Association Locator
Contents Pages
Market Research
Subscription Center

Daily News

U.S. Court Upholds CPSC's Right to Fine
Nov 3, 2004
 Printable format
 Email this Article

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a major court victory that upholds CPSC's requirement for companies to report dangers and defects with consumer products to the government in a timely manner.

The court ruled unanimously that companies who fail to abide by the reporting requirement can be held liable to pay substantial civil penalties. The ruling was made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Diego, CA, U.S. and affirmed a $300,000 civil penalty against Mirama Enterprises Inc. Mirama, which does business as Aroma Housewares Co., failed to report a serious product hazard with its electric juicers that shattered and injured consumers.

"This case is unprecedented, as no court has ever addressed CPSC's reporting requirement,” said CPSC Chairman Hal Stratton. “The Court agreed with CPSC that companies must tell us about potentially dangerous products even before they are found to be defective and that companies are liable for reporting every product they sell that poses a danger to consumers."

As a result, the court ruled, "Aroma was required to report not merely the 23 juicers that shattered, but the 30,000 to 40,000 juicers in the stream of commerce that might well pose an unreasonable risk of serious injury to consumers. When it failed to do so, Aroma committed 30,000 to 40,000 reporting offenses."

The 9th Circuit also rejected Aroma's argument that proof of a defect was required before a civil penalty could be imposed for a failure to report under the Consumer Product Safety Act. The appellate court held that "Congress's decision to impose penalties for reporting violations without requiring proof of a product defect encourages companies to provide necessary information to the Commission."

"When companies inform us right away about a problem with a product, it allows CPSC to work quickly and cooperatively with the company to determine if the product is defective, and if it is, then we can warn consumers before anyone suffers harm," added Mr. Stratton.

The district court case was the first time that a federal court found that a company had violated the reporting statute and directly imposed a civil penalty.

Back to Daily News


Daily News


Sep 25, 2014: Cub Cadet's new lawn tractor has Bluetooth and its own app

Sep 24, 2014: GE has the highest ranked appliance brand website; h.h. gregg ranked top appliance retailer website

Sep 24, 2014: Haier becomes first refrigerator maker to offer a lifetime compressor warranty

Sep 24, 2014: New condensing dishwasher from Whirlpool's plant in Wroclaw, Poland

Sep 24, 2014: Index points to growth in consumer spending on tech products in remaining months of 2014

More Daily News>>

RSS Feeds
Appliance Industry
Market Research


September 2014: Appliance Industry Focus: HVAC
June 2014: Appliance Magazine Market Insight: April 2014
May 2014: Appliance Magazine Market Insight: March 2014
April 2014: Appliance Magazine Market Insight: February 2014

Contact Us | About Us | Subscriptions | Advertising | Home
UBM Canon © 2014  

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon Corporate | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows