|
 Figure 5 (top). Operate and release voltage as a function of the maximum soldering temperature and duration of the soldering process. Minimum, average, and maximum values are given before and after the soldering process.
Figure 6 (bottom). Minimum, average, and maximum contact resistance during the entire electrical endurance tests of normally open contacts (left bar) and normally closed contacts (right bar) as a function of the maximum soldering temperature.
|
Wetting Tests
When the solder bath method is applied, the terminals must be 95-percent covered with new tin. This was the case for all parameters tested.
When the wetting test is judged after reflow soldering, the visual appearance and mechanical properties of the soldered joint were judged. All wetting tests showed sufficient wetting for lead-free relays. Nevertheless, lead in the solder or on the terminals improves the wetting characteristics significantly. The appearance of lead-free soldered joints, which was grained, was different from the soldered joints containing lead, which were smooth and shiny.
Moisture-Sensitive Level Tests
The moisture-sensitive level of electromechanical relays is determined by the moisture absorbed by the plastics—the peak temperature during the soldering process and the maximum pressure the relay housing can withstand before cracking. The tested IM relays were able to withstand an internal pressure increase during soldering of ?3,000 mbar before cracking. After the storage of the relays at 30°C/60-percent RH for 696 or 192 hours, respectively, the pressure increase was measured at a peak soldering temperature of 235°C and 255°C. As shown in Table 3, the pressure increase after a storage time of 192 hours was 830 mbar for a peak temperature of 255°C and 750 mbar for 235°C. After a storage time of 696 hours, the pressure increase is close to the permitted limit. Therefore, the moisture sensitive level (MLS) of the relays was defined as 3.
Resistance to Soldering Heat Tests
The functional values of the relays were measured initially and than after being soldered three times. As shown in Figure 5, no relevant changes in the operate and release voltage were measured. No dependence on the temperature was detected.
After the triple soldering, typical electrical endurance tests for telecom relays were performed—contact application 0 and cable load open end—in order to check a possible negative impact of the higher peak soldering temperature and the longer process duration. Figure 6 shows that even during these most critical electrical endurance tests, no negative influence of the higher soldering temperature was found.
Climatic Tests
The results of the climatic tests are summarized in Table 4 and Figure 7. The performance during all climatic tests performed was not affected by the soldering conditions applied.
Whisker growth - Whisker generation is an effect based on stress in the tin surface. To minimize this effect under the tin coating, a nickel layer was plated. On the bent terminals of the test sample, absolutely no whisker growth was observed. The combination of a nickel and pure tin coating reliably prevents whisker growth.
Dry heat 110°C/56 days - Contact resistance was measured immediately after cooling the relays to room temperature. Normally closed contacts were measured before actuating the coil; normally open contacts were measured after the first actuation. The contact resistance values measured after temperature storage at 110°C for 56 days are not dependent on the soldering conditions. No changes in functional values and leakage rate were observed. Visual inspection of the soldered joints and the cross sections showed the soldered connections to be reliable for all parameter combinations.
Damp heat 55°C-95-percent RH/56 days - The same procedure was applied for measuring the contact resistance. No changes were found and no dependence on different soldering conditions, as the measured resistance values are very stable. No changes in functional values and leakage rate were observed. Visual inspection of the soldered joints and the cross sections showed the soldered connections to be reliable for all parameter combinations.
Thermal shock 40°C /+85°C – 200 cycles - The thermal shock test is the most stringent test for evaluating gas tightness and the integrity of the soldered joints. After 200 thermal shocks, the contact resistance showed no dependence on the soldering conditions. No changes in functional values or leakage rate were observed. Visual inspection of the soldered joints and the cross sections showed the soldered connections to be reliable for all parameter combinations.
Terminal
Surface
|
Solder
|
Temperature
|
Flux/solder paste
|
Method
|
Sn
100
|
SnAgCu
3.5/0.7
|
245°C
|
Colophony
|
bath
|
Sn
100
|
SnPb
63/37
|
235°C
|
Colophony
|
bath
|
Sn
100
|
SnAgCu
3.5/0.7
|
245°C
|
SenjuM31-GR N360-K1MK
|
reflow
|
Sn
100
|
SnPb
63/37
|
235°C
|
SenjuM31-GR N360-K1MK
|
reflow
|
|
| Table 1. Tested combinations for wetting of
the terminals. The tests were performed according to IEC 60068-2-58 [30]. |
|
| |
Parameter
Combination
|
Max.
Temperature [°C]
|
Surface
Pins
|
Surface
PCB
|
Solder
Paste
|
1
|
255
|
Sn
100
|
Sn
100
|
SnAgCu
3.5/0.7
|
2
|
235
|
Sn
100
|
SnPb
63/37
|
SnPb
63/37
|
|
Table
2. Parameters for climatic tests.
|
|
| |
Level |
Floor life |
Tests conditions |
Pressure increase [mbar] |
Function |
235°C |
255°C |
2a |
4 weeks |
30°C/60%
RH
696 hours |
2,300
2,300
|
2,500
2,500 |
o.k.
o.k. |
3 |
1 week |
30°C/60% RH
192 hours |
750
|
830
|
o.k.
|
|
| Table
3. Pressure increase during determination of the moisture sensitive
level (MSL) of relays [JEDEC]. |
|
Test/Parameter Combination |
Contact Resistance
[mOhm] |
Functional Values |
Leakage Rate [mbar,1/s] |
Solder Connection
Visual Plus Cross Section |
Dry heat/1 |
less
than/equal to 100 |
o.k. |
less
than/equal to 3.10-8
|
o.k. |
Dry heat/2 |
less
than/equal to 100
|
o.k. |
less
than/equal to 3.10-8
|
o.k. |
Damp heat/1 |
less
than/equal to 100
|
o.k. |
less
than/equal to 3.10-8
|
o.k. |
Damp heat/2 |
less
than/equal to 100
|
o.k. |
less
than/equal to 3.10-8
|
o.k. |
Thermal shock/1 |
less
than/equal to 100
|
o.k. |
less
than/equal to 3.10-8
|
o.k. |
Thermal shock/2 |
less
than/equal to 100
|
o.k. |
less
than/equal to 3.10-8 |
o.k. |
|
| Table 4. Overview of the climatic test results. |
|
| |
|

Figure 7. Minimum, average, and maximum contact resistance values measured after temperature storage of normally open contacts (left bar) and normally closed contacts (right bar) soldered with different solder profiles and after the climatic tests.
|
|
Conclusion
Various legislation in regions such as Europe, Japan, and China means that lead-free soldering can be expected in the near future. Producing electromechanical relays for lead-free soldering was a challenge, as lead-free soldering stresses the precision mechanics, which are at the heart of ultra-miniature relays. With the increase in peak process temperatures up to 255°C and the increase in process duration, the thermal stress goes to the performance limits of available engineering plastics.
In order to make signal relays available for lead-free soldering processes, the following requirements must be fulfilled:
• The design must be able to handle high temperatures during the soldering process. Possible mechanical changes must not have an impact on the functional values of the relay.
• Materials with the lowest possible outgassing and water absorption rate must be used in combination with good mechanical properties at high temperatures.
• Special care must be taken to keep the relays dry. Dry packing must be applied to ensure no cracking of the relays during the soldering process.
In addition, taking account of the following basic requirements will enable manufacturers to produce relays suitable for lead-free soldering processes with significantly higher peak temperatures that meet the following standards:
• Relays made from proper materials and manufacturing processes can withstand a lead-free soldering process. No cracking or “popcorning” of the housings was observed.
• The IM relay is able to handle soldering temperatures up to 255°C without changes in the functional values.
• Signal relays designed for lead-free soldering processes have the same performance during electrical endurance tests. No negative impact was observed.
• The reliability of electromechanical relays soldered with lead-free processes can achieve the same level as standard SMD relays.
• The appearance and surface of standard leaded soldered joints are totally different from lead-free ones. While leaded soldered connections are regular and shiny, lead-free connections are rough and grained.
• Whisker growth on pure tin surfaces of terminals can be efficiently prevented by a nickel coating underneath the tin surface
• The results obtained from mixed assemblies showed similar performance during all climatic tests.
This is an edited version of a paper presented at the 52nd Annual International Relay Conference, held in April 2004.
About the Author

Dr. Werner Johler is technology manager at Tyco Electronics in Au, Switzerland.
He received his Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Technical University
(Vienna, Austria) in 1988 and his MBA in 2003. From 1984 to 1988, Dr. Johler
was a scientific staff member at the Institute of Switchgear at the Technical
University of Vienna. In 1988, he joined Tyco Electronics AXICOM. He has been
chairman of the Technical Committee TC94 “All or nothing relays” within
CENELEC since 1999.